# Building blocks of language, structure and thought

As I travel on my path to perhaps what I deem as some sort of enlightenment, back in time via Clojure to one of the great ancestors of language, structure and computational thought (Lisp), I continue to come across a simple theme.

**Building Blocks**

That theme is the concept of basic building blocks with which vast cathedrals can be constructed. Those building blocks are, in Lisp terms at least, `car`

, `cdr`

and `cons`

.

One of my companions on this path is Daniel Higginbotham's Clojure for the Brave and True. In Part II, covering Language Fundamentals, Clojure's abstractions, or interfaces, are discussed. One of the Clojure philosophies is that the abstraction idea allows a simplified collection of functions that work across a range of different data structures. Abstracting action patterns from concrete implementations allows this to happen. This is nicely illustrated with a look the `first`

, `rest`

and `cons`

functions from the sequence (or 'seq') abstraction.

There's a close parallel between `first`

, `rest`

& `cons`

in Clojure and `car`

, `cdr`

& `cons`

in other Lisps such as Scheme. And there's an inherent and implicit beauty in a collection of constructs so simple yet collectively so powerful. You can read about the origins of the terms `car`

and `cdr`

on the Wikipedia page, which have a depth and a degree of venerability of their own. Essentially both sets of functions implement a linked list, which can be simply illustrated, as shown in the book and elsewhere, as a sequence of connected nodes, like this:

```
node1 node2 node3
+--------------+ +--------------+ +--------------+
| value | next |-->| value | next |-->| value | next |
+--------------+ +--------------+ +--------------+
| | |
V V V
"one" "two" "three"
```

**Implementing a linked list**

Daniel goes on to show how such a linked list of nodes like this, along with the three functions, can be simply implemented in, say, JavaScript. Given that these nodes could be represented like this in JavaScript:

`node3 = { value: "three", next: null }`

node2 = { value: "two", next: node3 }

node1 = { value: "one", next: node2 }

then the `first`

, `rest`

and `cons`

functions could be implemented as follows:

`function first(n) { return n.value; }`

function rest(n) { return n.next; }

function cons(newval, n) { return { value: newval, next: n }; }

With those basic building blocks implemented, you can even build the next level, for example, he shows that map might be implemented thus:

`function map(s, f) {`

if (s === null) {

return null;

} else {

return cons(f(first(s)), map(rest(s), f));

}

}

To me, there's a beauty there that is twofold. It's implemented using the three core functions we've already seen, the core atoms, if you will. Moreover, there's a beauty in the recursion and the "first and rest pattern" I touched upon earlier in "A meditation on reduction".

**Using the building blocks**

Let's look at another example of how those simple building blocks are put together to form something greater. This time, we'll take inspiration from a presentation by Marc Feeley: "The 90 minute Scheme to C compiler". In a slide on tail calls and garbage collection, the sample code, in Scheme (a dialect of Lisp), is shown with a tail call recursion approach thus:

`(define f`

(lambda (n x)

(if (= n 0)

(car x)

(f (- n 1)

(cons (cdr x)

(+ (car x)

(cdr x)))))))

If you stare long enough at this you'll realise two things: It really only uses the core functions `car`

(`first`

), `cdr`

(`rest`

) and `cons`

. And it's a little generator for finding the Nth term of the Fibonacci sequence:

`(f 20 (cons 1 1)) ; => 10946`

I love that even the example call uses `cons`

to construct the second parameter.

I read today, in "Farewell, Marvin Minsky (1927–2016)" by Stephen Wolfram, how Marvin said that "programming languages are the only ones that people are expected to learn to write before they can read". This is a great observation, and one that I'd like to think about a bit more. But before I do, I'd at least like to consider that studying the building blocks of language helps in reading, as well as writing.